I had been working on a client project where I built the GraphQL backend for a new social network using primarily AppSync, Lambda and DynamoDB.
One of the features of the app was to support private messaging between two users. To allow either user to fetch their chat messages in chronological descending order, I modelled the chat_messages DynamoDB table as below:
userIds is the HASH key, and timestamp is the
userIds is a composite key made up of the two users’ IDs, arrange in lexicographical order. If you know the two users’ IDs, you can fetch the chat messages using a DynamoDB
So in the VTL template, I had something like this:
However, this didn’t work.
Given the following input:
$userIds variable would be interpreted as
35c1f714–46c1–4ccb-87fc-933da626ce6a_08371580–48e2–43e7–9b1c-75804b9e7e12, where the user IDs are arranged in the wrong order. What’s going on?
If you work with Java everyday then the problem might be obvious to you, that to compare strings lexicographically you need to use the
compareTo method on the first string. And since VTL is implemented in Java, that is also the case here.
Instead, the right way to do it is this:
I have found the VTL Reference page very handy while working with VTL. But unfortunately, lexicographical string comparison was not mentioned in the VTL docs. Without helpful folks like Richard and Franck I would have easily spent hours banging my head against this problem!
I hope this post helps you in a similar way should you run into the same problem, as my way of passing it forward.
Master AppSync and GraphQL
If you want to learn GraphQL and AppSync with a hands-on tutorial then please check out the AppSync Masterclass where you will build a Twitter clone using a combination of AppSync, Lambda, DynamoDB, Cognito and Vue.js. You will learn about different GraphQL modelling techniques, how to debug resolvers, CI/CD, monitoring and alerting and much more.